All of my audio tracks are being rejected suddenly

Don, while you and others (including me) sell a few old clips every week, someone pays for the storage and database activity of a million of them. Would you feel comfortable if you had to pay $0.03 per clip per month for storing and finding all these old clips ?
I hope someone is making the calculations.

In the newsletter they sent us a couple of days ago I read Epidemic Sound is now selling their catalogue ( or part of it ) through Pond5. They have around 3000 tracks, quality is pretty high. This might partially play a part in the new criteria curators are using when evaluating submissions.

Why are we worried about P5's storage costs? They are in business and have done a great job so far. Worrying about storage costs and suggesting a price for old clips is just silly. Don't you think P5 already filters crap files from showing up? As long as clip has quality and or subject matter that is desirable then it's worth having both old and new clips available. If this were not so why do you think P5 paid probably millions to capture and display Public Domain, many of which are not very good quality.

We all need to work on quality and forget about P5 storage or operational costs, it doesn't matter to any Artist.