Compression Advice.

Continent5iveFilms 7 Sep 2008 18:43
Learned colleagues;

I am capturing and editing HD footage. My NLE can render direct to Quicktime MOV files, but there is a HUGE arrray of compression codecs to choose from. If I do NOT compress, the resultant file is, obviously TOO huge to upload, but what is the best means of getting a small enough file whilst still maintaining High Definition?

Regards and more power to yoour art.
Spud
Normstock 7 Sep 2008 20:31
I do motionjpegB with my HDV footage saved at 95% and rendered at best quality (Sony vegas software)

Norman
Continent5iveFilms 7 Sep 2008 22:31
Hi Norman. Many thanks for your input. I should have said that I shoot 25f progressive, so obviously I have to use the PHOTO JPEG option. I have Ulead Videostudio, that can export to it, or I can just convert using MPEG Stream.
dnavarrojr 8 Sep 2008 12:56
For progressive footage I use Photo JPEG at 95%.
dapoopta 8 Sep 2008 13:08
I usually do 99%, since it doesn't seem to be a large size difference between 95 and 99.
dnavarrojr 8 Sep 2008 17:03
Depends on the source of the footage. :)

In any case, Photo JPEG is your best bet for progressive footage. Just experiment with the quality settings to see if you are satisfied.
Continent5iveFilms 12 Sep 2008 22:57
Many thanks guys for all your help.
RekindlePhoto 12 Sep 2008 23:53
What camera ya using? Looks like a pseudo progressive "f" like Canon does instead of a true progressive. If so why did you chose to use "f" instead of the more native 60i interlaced. Really don't want to re-start the progressive Versus interlaced. That has been beat to death in several other threads here at P5.
Good Luck,

Edit: I see you use the Canon HV-30. I also have shot the HV-20 and now the Canon XH-A1. From everything I have found the more native 60i gives a more accurate capture. I also see you do a lot of underwater, the HV-30 would be perfect, small package and easy to use under the waves.
Don