Which types of buyers prefer non-PRO music?
ppuser
10 Jul 2019 11:30
Hi,
The dilemma “Pro vs non-Pro” has already been discussed a lot and I understand that for composers at high-end libraries is more important to be in a PRO than composers in Royalty-Free Libraries but i would like to make a more specific question on the subject.
First of all the benefits of being registered with a PRO are obvious, though not equally important for all. But I try to figure out - unsuccessfully till now, if there are really some positives in NOT being registered with a PRO (except for the time you save avoiding bureaucracy). And that always leads me to the following question:
Which types of buyers prefer to buy non-PRO music? In other words, what types of usages, leads a buyer to avoid PRO music?
I would greatly appreciate a help on this.
The dilemma “Pro vs non-Pro” has already been discussed a lot and I understand that for composers at high-end libraries is more important to be in a PRO than composers in Royalty-Free Libraries but i would like to make a more specific question on the subject.
First of all the benefits of being registered with a PRO are obvious, though not equally important for all. But I try to figure out - unsuccessfully till now, if there are really some positives in NOT being registered with a PRO (except for the time you save avoiding bureaucracy). And that always leads me to the following question:
Which types of buyers prefer to buy non-PRO music? In other words, what types of usages, leads a buyer to avoid PRO music?
I would greatly appreciate a help on this.