Canon EOS C300

wideweb 19 Jan 2012 05:38

Buy a house for this price? Please buy two houses for me @this price. I'll pick them up in the next payday.

ionescu 19 Jan 2012 06:26

104k USD is the price(body + two lenses).

dapoopta 19 Jan 2012 23:23

If it feels good at NAB I'm taking one home, and buying one for you Jake.

JHDT_Productions 19 Jan 2012 23:26

As long as it doesn't mean we're going steady.
I might be cheap but I'm not easy.

AcmeStudios 20 Jan 2012 03:04

Maybe we should all form a Mega Millions Lottery group, and play weekly.

When we win (and you know we will...) - we will have enough cash to just buy the damn company, and have the engineers build what we want :-)

ironstrike 20 Jan 2012 03:18

Just FYI I shot my 3rd National (US) ad with one of these
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Canon+-+PowerShot+ELPH+100+HS+12.1-Megapixel+Digital+Camera+-+Gray/2030087.p?id=1218306466236&skuId=2030087

Just saying.... Camera's not as important as guys like Philip bloom make it sound.

ionescu 20 Jan 2012 09:42

"Camera's not as important as guys"
TRUE!

kagemusha 22 Jan 2012 03:24

it says, Minimum ISO is "320". why should I pay 16.000$ to a body that can not shoot at 100 iso? it is weird..

JADesign 22 Jan 2012 03:28

I think we should all pool our money, and then we just rotate it around. So we all get it a week a year! LOL!

wideweb 22 Jan 2012 09:43

Kagemusha: It is because it has higher quality at ISO 320 than at ISO 100 in all aspects.
Forget film, Kodak is irrelevant.