Nikon D500
Beckhusen
13 Jan 2016 12:24
Looks very interesting and is in the price range which should be acceptable for a non-full-time artist who wants to offer perfect quality.
What i would like to know:
Is here any artist who uses Canon EF lenses at a Nikon DSLR? I think it must be possible by adapter, but will it work?
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/dslr-cameras/d500.html?icid=hp:topbanner:dslr:d500:010516:pre
What i would like to know:
Is here any artist who uses Canon EF lenses at a Nikon DSLR? I think it must be possible by adapter, but will it work?
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/dslr-cameras/d500.html?icid=hp:topbanner:dslr:d500:010516:pre
BunFest
13 Jan 2016 13:09
Body over €2300- Not cheap for a body.
With 16-80mm lens F2.8 to F4 cost 3329€.
Is it Full frame? I guess so. How is the low light performance, is it so good as Sony?
With 16-80mm lens F2.8 to F4 cost 3329€.
Is it Full frame? I guess so. How is the low light performance, is it so good as Sony?
Normstock
13 Jan 2016 22:59
^No."........APS-C
BunFest
14 Jan 2016 06:25
Then very expensive for a not full-frame camera. Anyway it looks quite big for me. No..
davinakrug
14 Jan 2016 19:36
Using Canon lenses with a Nikon body is unlikely to work due to the flange size and distance. You can do the other way around easily mainly because the Nikon F mount is smaller than the Canon EOS mount. You'd need an adapter with a corrective lens for focus for it to be any use to you.
The D500 is a "Pro" APS-C DSLR with proper weather sealing, the connections you'd expect from a pro camera, and apparently excellent high ISO performance. The price isn't bad for what you get. If you are a wildlife photographer, the APS-C size is likely more of a benefit than a hinderance.
It looks great for video, the sensor is pretty much super 35mm. Unfortunately the UHD recording is done by cropping, leaving us with something like a micro 4/3 size recording area.
The D500 is a "Pro" APS-C DSLR with proper weather sealing, the connections you'd expect from a pro camera, and apparently excellent high ISO performance. The price isn't bad for what you get. If you are a wildlife photographer, the APS-C size is likely more of a benefit than a hinderance.
It looks great for video, the sensor is pretty much super 35mm. Unfortunately the UHD recording is done by cropping, leaving us with something like a micro 4/3 size recording area.
RekindlePhoto
14 Jan 2016 21:55
How is this camera expensive? Under $2,000 is not expensive for a quality dslr, in fact really pretty low cost.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1214161&gclid=COedp5OlqsoCFc2CfgodoacKRw&is=REG&ap=y&m=Y&Q=&A=details
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1214161&gclid=COedp5OlqsoCFc2CfgodoacKRw&is=REG&ap=y&m=Y&Q=&A=details
BunFest
14 Jan 2016 23:46
For $ is cheaper, € is more. $1996 only body.
I don't sell a picture for over 30,000- yet? :D
I don't sell a picture for over 30,000- yet? :D
RekindlePhoto
15 Jan 2016 00:02
EU is almost 1:1, British Pound holding much better than the EU. You are right, those in Europe are being screwed on almost every product and commodity. I do feel the pain for anyone having to upgrade at EU or Pounds pricing. It's still much cheaper than Nikon or Canon full size sensor cameras that were just announced. Nikon at $6,700 and Canon at probably $6,000. I hope the Canon specs are great for photo and video and I'll upgrade. Just being spoiled carrying the very small and light Sony AX-100 and RX-10II. Their video is outstanding but photos are just snapshots.
Beckhusen
15 Jan 2016 00:03
Cameras like this are an investment for 5 years and more, not for only 2 years ;)
RekindlePhoto
15 Jan 2016 02:13
Absolutely, cameras like D500 and D5 and the Canon 1DX MK II are great cameras with years of legs to support them. For me the Sony AX-100 and RX 10II were temporary cameras to bridge time waiting for the quality cameras to come. MAYBE we will see them soon.