Stupid rejection reasons...
Mizamook
1 Jun 2016 17:59
Copy clip ID number to clipboard: 63451271
Under forum post form thingy, see and click on "clip"
Paste clip ID number in the box that pops, up, next box gives selection, enter 3 for preview.
Under forum post form thingy, see and click on "clip"
Paste clip ID number in the box that pops, up, next box gives selection, enter 3 for preview.
GlobalStock
1 Jun 2016 19:42
Thanks, Mizamook! Here's a close shot of the painter plus easel. How can the curator pick one of the two- they are vastly different..?!
Cannot find item [63451324]!
Cannot find item [63451324]!
GlobalStock
1 Jun 2016 19:46
GlobalStock
1 Jun 2016 19:46
GlobalStock
1 Jun 2016 19:49
Historic 35km long dike and marvel of technology: the Afsluitdijk in the Netherlands. No such clip exists...
cinecameratv
3 Jun 2016 01:14
Nice clips. Roads, streets, avenues, neighborhoods may look the same but is their location that is important. If somebody wants a street in the Netherlands it is a street in the Netherlands and not in France even if they look the same. At this time I do not understand P5 curators.
WeatherNews
3 Jun 2016 01:51
This is hard to believe, all clips of a loud wailing tornado warning sired REJECTED by Pond5 for loud distracting noise, curator suggested I delete the audio on those clips.
I do try to delete all audio tracks normally but I left the audio on these ones for a specific reason, tornado warning sirens aren't silent but I guess they don't know that.
I do try to delete all audio tracks normally but I left the audio on these ones for a specific reason, tornado warning sirens aren't silent but I guess they don't know that.
Beckhusen
3 Jun 2016 07:41
It's all about the curator's personal favour. I self also wonder in the moment. After some really fair curations in the last time other curators have the skill to accept what normally don't sell, and to reject what regulary sells.
Wasting time to think about it.
Wasting time to think about it.
GlobalStock
3 Jun 2016 09:09
It's hard to accept that hard, thoughtful work is just thrown out the window because a curator has been told to be more critical but doesn't take the time or has the experience or skill to differentiate.
I understand it's not easy with the volume of clips thrown at curator's but it's imperative that they keep an open mind and not just be critical towards the work they judge but also towards themselves.
I am all for a more restricted acceptance policy but if this means erratic rejections of good material, it really undermines the motivation of contributors. Plus, and perhaps more of a compelling argument for P5, they're basically throwing away revenues.
I understand it's not easy with the volume of clips thrown at curator's but it's imperative that they keep an open mind and not just be critical towards the work they judge but also towards themselves.
I am all for a more restricted acceptance policy but if this means erratic rejections of good material, it really undermines the motivation of contributors. Plus, and perhaps more of a compelling argument for P5, they're basically throwing away revenues.
WeatherNews
3 Jun 2016 13:50
I suspect the curators performance is measured by how many clips they keep out of the system, they are like goalies now, don't let anything in.
I am quite sure it's about costs of storage and not these new higher standards, some pretty low standard video has been selling over the years along with the better stuff and cash is cash so P5 is turning down revenue because of standards?.
I am quite sure it's about costs of storage and not these new higher standards, some pretty low standard video has been selling over the years along with the better stuff and cash is cash so P5 is turning down revenue because of standards?.